Excellent explanation, John, of why we must accept as canonical all the books of the Bible!
The Bible, comprising 73 books in its Catholic tradition, is revered as the inspired Word of God, offering guidance, wisdom, and truth to believers. Respecting all 73 books underscores the unity and completeness of God’s revelation. Each book, from Genesis to Revelation, contributes uniquely to the biblical narrative, portraying the story of salvation, the nature of God, and the moral and spiritual framework for humanity.
Disregarding any portion of the Bible risks distorting its overarching message and theological richness. The 73 books, recognized by the Catholic Church, were discerned through centuries of tradition and guided by the Holy Spirit. This canon reflects the fullness of Christian teaching, offering spiritual nourishment and fostering a deeper relationship with God. By respecting all its books, believers affirm their commitment to the entirety of divine revelation and the Church's authority in preserving sacred Scripture.
An honest understanding as to why our Protestant brethren do not accept 7 books, should lead them to acceptance. Once again, it comes down to not accepting the authority of the Catholic Church, and something they must get over to enjoy the total richness of their Christian faith.
Thank you Mac Carol for sharing your thoughtful reflections. There truly is a beauty in the Word of God that no one should choose to miss! Let's pray that more and more people come to know Christ and his Church.
Very clear advice here. I do such extensive word studies and found other books to fall off the cliff of contextual consistency. Should I read those books for history? I still use caution and look to see who does accept those extra texts. I mean, if a demonic cult accepts certain texts, perhaps that is best to be avoided. 😁 (Yes demonic cults accept some texts - I am not referring to traditional Christian denominations here, even though John Wesley might say it was so lol.)
Hi Linda! Thank you for your thoughtful comment. :) I agree that discernment is always important. While some groups outside traditional Christianity might also claim certain texts, that doesn’t necessarily diminish their value when read through a faithful and informed lens. If you approach these texts with the same prayerful discernment you use for word studies, they can be read for both historical enrichment and spiritual insight. I’d encourage you to explore them with the guidance of trusted Christian commentaries or resources to see what they have to offer. For me, if I start to see writings that are adverse to traditional Catholic theology and doctrine, then I would limit their use or avoid them altogether. As for demonic cults using certain texts ... I believe their effort is almost always in twisting those texts and perverting their original intended message that would otherwise be valuable to authentic Christians.
Excellent explanation, John, of why we must accept as canonical all the books of the Bible!
The Bible, comprising 73 books in its Catholic tradition, is revered as the inspired Word of God, offering guidance, wisdom, and truth to believers. Respecting all 73 books underscores the unity and completeness of God’s revelation. Each book, from Genesis to Revelation, contributes uniquely to the biblical narrative, portraying the story of salvation, the nature of God, and the moral and spiritual framework for humanity.
Disregarding any portion of the Bible risks distorting its overarching message and theological richness. The 73 books, recognized by the Catholic Church, were discerned through centuries of tradition and guided by the Holy Spirit. This canon reflects the fullness of Christian teaching, offering spiritual nourishment and fostering a deeper relationship with God. By respecting all its books, believers affirm their commitment to the entirety of divine revelation and the Church's authority in preserving sacred Scripture.
An honest understanding as to why our Protestant brethren do not accept 7 books, should lead them to acceptance. Once again, it comes down to not accepting the authority of the Catholic Church, and something they must get over to enjoy the total richness of their Christian faith.
Thank you Mac Carol for sharing your thoughtful reflections. There truly is a beauty in the Word of God that no one should choose to miss! Let's pray that more and more people come to know Christ and his Church.
John this was so theologically rich and thoughtful. The context, the analysis, and the apostolic authority .:chefs kiss:.
This is so approachable for any Catholic. Great writing, brother.
Thank you, Emmanuel! Your words are very kind and much appreciated!
Very clear advice here. I do such extensive word studies and found other books to fall off the cliff of contextual consistency. Should I read those books for history? I still use caution and look to see who does accept those extra texts. I mean, if a demonic cult accepts certain texts, perhaps that is best to be avoided. 😁 (Yes demonic cults accept some texts - I am not referring to traditional Christian denominations here, even though John Wesley might say it was so lol.)
Hi Linda! Thank you for your thoughtful comment. :) I agree that discernment is always important. While some groups outside traditional Christianity might also claim certain texts, that doesn’t necessarily diminish their value when read through a faithful and informed lens. If you approach these texts with the same prayerful discernment you use for word studies, they can be read for both historical enrichment and spiritual insight. I’d encourage you to explore them with the guidance of trusted Christian commentaries or resources to see what they have to offer. For me, if I start to see writings that are adverse to traditional Catholic theology and doctrine, then I would limit their use or avoid them altogether. As for demonic cults using certain texts ... I believe their effort is almost always in twisting those texts and perverting their original intended message that would otherwise be valuable to authentic Christians.