The New Eve and an Old Misunderstanding
A follow-up article to my dialogue with a Protestant concerned about Catholic teaching
I recently shared an article—along with a “Righteous Outrage” video—responding to someone I’ll call “Red,” who quoted St. Irenaeus and then concluded, “This is why I’m glad I’m not Catholic.” It wasn’t St. Irenaeus’s words that concerned me. What struck me was the sadness of seeing someone misunderstand the faith and then feel relief at remaining outside of the Church Christ Himself founded—for him.
Red followed up by saying that since Original Sin came through Adam—not Eve alone—only Christ, the New Adam, could undo the eternal consequences of that fall. And honestly? I don’t disagree with him. I only disagree that his view is complete and in full focus. Here’s why:
When the early Church Fathers spoke of Mary as the “New Eve,” they were not elevating her to divine status, nor were they confusing her role with that of Christ our Savior. Rather, they were reading the story of salvation through the lens of typology—a way of understanding how events and people in the Old Testament prefigure and point toward those in the New. In this light, Mary is seen not as a Redeemer, but as one who freely cooperated with the Redeemer. She is not Christ’s equal, but His humble servant.
One recent conversation raised the concern that associating Mary with the undoing of Eve’s disobedience "smacks of error," arguing that only Adam held the federal headship that brought about the curse of sin, and that Christ alone reversed it. There’s no dispute here: Adam’s sin wounded all humanity, and only Jesus Christ, true God and true man, could break the chains of that curse. But it is also true that Mary’s role in salvation history deserves our reflection—not because she replaced Christ, but because her “yes” made space for Him to enter our world.
Eve and Mary: A Parallel of Freedom and Obedience
Let’s take a moment to reflect on the striking similarities and contrasts that the early Church observed between Eve and Mary:
Eve was a virgin. So was Mary.
Eve was approached by a fallen angel (Satan in the form of a serpent). Mary was approached by a holy angel (Gabriel).
Eve listened to the serpent’s lies and said “no” to God’s command. Mary listened to the angel’s truth and said “yes” to God’s will.
Eve’s disobedience contributed to the Fall. Mary’s obedience opened the door to Redemption.
As St. Irenaeus (a disciple of St. Polycarp, who in turn learned from the Apostle John) wrote in the second century:
“The knot of Eve’s disobedience was untied by the obedience of Mary. What the virgin Eve bound by her unbelief, the Virgin Mary loosed by her faith.”
(Against Heresies, Book III, 22.4)
St. Irenaeus was not writing new Scripture, nor redefining doctrine. He was offering a beautiful reflection on how the story of humanity’s Fall foreshadows the story of its Redemption. Eve’s “no” was mirrored—and healed—by Mary’s “yes.” It’s not that Mary undid the curse; it’s that she cooperated with the One who did.
A Matter of Typology, Not Theology of Divinity
Typology is not an exercise in rewriting Scripture. It’s a tool for seeing how God tells a consistent, meaningful story through human history. Just as Jesus is the “New Adam” (Romans 5:14, 1 Corinthians 15:45), Mary is the “New Eve”—a figure who contrasts with Eve not as Savior, but as one who freely aligned herself with God’s saving plan.
Critics sometimes worry that this typological comparison elevates Mary too highly or attributes to her divine powers. That’s simply not what the Church teaches. The Catechism of the Catholic Church is clear:
“Mary's role in the Church is inseparable from her union with Christ and flows directly from it. This union of the mother with the Son in the work of salvation is made manifest... above all at the hour of his Passion” (CCC 964).
Even St. John Henry Newman, who once struggled with Catholic teaching before entering the Church, wrote:
“Mary is the human instrument by which the Son of God entered into the world; she is not the Source of grace, but she was made by grace to be its channel.”
Some theologians, such as Newman and Aquinas, may poetically call Mary a "cause" of our salvation in a secondary sense—but always with the understanding that she is not the Source, only the instrument, chosen and graced by God to cooperate in His plan.
Mary and the Covenant of Grace
A recent challenge claimed that Mary had no "covenantal authority," and thus could not act on behalf of anyone but herself. But covenant in Scripture is not only about formal headship (as in Adam or Christ); it is also about God’s gracious initiative and humanity’s response. Mary’s response—“Be it done unto me according to thy word”—is a profound moment of covenantal faithfulness. She does not act in authority; she acts in surrender.
She is not singled out because she is greater than others who were faithful—like Elizabeth, Anna, or Paul—but because her cooperation with grace is uniquely tied to the Incarnation itself. That moment, that yes, changed the course of history.
The Story Is Always About Christ
Some fear that Marian devotion steals glory from Jesus. But authentic Catholic teaching always turns the heart toward Christ. As Mary herself says in Luke 1:46–47:
“My soul magnifies the Lord, and my spirit rejoices in God my Savior.”
We do not praise Mary because she redeemed us. We praise her because, by the grace of God, she cooperated with the Redeemer. She shows us what it means to say yes to God—not as a goddess or a co-savior, but as the humble handmaid of the Lord.
A Final Word
Sometimes, people reject the Catholic faith not because of what the Church actually teaches, but because of what they think she teaches. That’s not only unfortunate—it’s tragic. In an age of confusion, we who belong to Christ have a responsibility not just to pass on the faith to future generations, but to clarify it with patience and charity to our Protestant brothers and sisters who may have only encountered a distorted picture.
Mary’s story doesn’t add fifteen new chapters to Scripture. It doesn’t rewrite the Gospel. It simply reflects something beautiful and true: that God invites human cooperation in His divine plan, and when we say yes, amazing things happen.
Even the Word can become flesh.
Let me know what you think. Leaving a comment below is a fantastic way for me to know that these articles are landing on your heart! If you disagree, then leave some “Righteous Outrage” of your own, and let’s continue the conversation. :)
I also want to ask that you help us grow so that we can bring content that’s good for the spirit to greater numbers of people. Please SUBSCRIBE and SHARE our articles with anyone you think might be inspired through it. Your premium subscriptions are a real blessing, because along with your prayers, they help us to expand and do more exciting things (ahem … our new and upcoming Magazine!).
Of course, you can also support us by just buying a Cup of Coffee through this link: https://buymeacoffee.com/johnhenry14
Want to connect offline? Email me at hello@alwaystowardthelight.org
Thank you for your support! Thank you for reading! I look forward to sharing more soon!